[Skip to Content]

For Authors  |  For Reviewers  |  For Associate Editors  |  Editorial Resources  |  Editorial Board and Staff  |  Contact Us 


Quick Guide for TRR Handling Editors


Handling Editors are responsible for evaluating the reviewer comments, assessing the relevance and suitability of the manuscript, and providing a timely decision to the author.

 

They will:
 

  • Solicit reviewers with suitable expertise.

  • Respect the confidentiality of the process and be objective and constructive in providing feedback.

  • Declare any conflicts of interest (professional, personal or financial) and recuse yourself; the TRR follows the COPE guidelines on publishing ethics.


New Submission Checklist

  • Read the Abstract and accept or reject the invitation to handle the paper within 5 days.

  • If the paper is unintelligible or otherwise meets one of our Criteria for Desk Rejections please Desk Reject and write a brief explanation for the author.

  • If the paper appears to warrant review, solicit at least 3 reviewers within 10 days.

  • The peer-review process is single blinded; i.e., the reviewers know who the authors are, but the authors do not know the names of the reviewers.

  • When a minimum of 3 reviews are complete, evaluate them and select one of the following decisions within 5 days: Reject or Revise. 

  • Only in rare circumstances should you choose Accept with Minor Revisions at this stage.

  • Once the revised paper is uploaded, the HE should look at the author response to reviewers, and either render a decision on or send back to the reviewer/s, depending on the complexity of the revisions and HE knowledge of the subject.


Committee-Recommended Paper Checklist

  • Papers that have been reviewed by a TRB committee have a telephone icon.

  • Read the Abstract and Reviews and accept or reject the invitation to handle the paper within 5 days.

  • If the paper merely confirms well-known results or otherwise meets our Criteria for Desk Rejections , please Desk Reject and write a brief explanation for the author

  • If there are comprehensive committee reviews and the author has revised the paper accordingly, you may Accept with Minor Revisions at this stage.

  • If the committee reviews are incomplete or lack clear guidance for the author, please solicit 1 or more new reviewers to evaluate the paper; you may, but you are not required to, review the paper yourself.

  • You may also contact the committee reviewers if they have indicated that they are willing to participate in TRR review.

  • When the reviews are complete, evaluate them and select one of the following decisions within 5 days: Reject or Revise.

For more information, please browse our Editorial Resource Guides.